Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 04/2004

    « LONDON /moleskinecity.com -- Mind the lamp! | Main | Sydney Playing Around »

    March 17, 2008

    Why Advertising Will Destroy Social Media

    OK, can I say I don't get it? I was reading Social Media Biggest Shift In Marketing Strategy Since Television? at ExperienceCurve and I read something that makes my head want to explode. Now, I read Karl's blog a lot and usually completely agree with him. In fact, he has two great pieces (here and here) just from the last few days that are well worth the read. But this one. Not so sure I agree with Karl on this one.

    The article talks about a TNS media intelligence/Cymfony report on the difference between social media revolutionaries and those companies that are taking a more wait & see attitude about social media. There was a quote in the article that says "Revolutionaries focus more on listening to consumer and bloggers’ points-of-view." And that's where I thought to myself How the heck can listening to the consumer be considered revolutionary??? I mean, seriously, isn't this the cornerstone of customer service, something that's been around for, what like a 1,000 years? The tools of social media may be new, but if listening to your customer is the cornerstone of defining social media, then social media isn't new.

    What is amazing to me is that our industry has so lost touch with the consumer that we think listening to the consumer is a revolutionary idea! Engaging the consumer isn't new, companies have been doing that for centuries! Listening to the consumer certainly shouldn't be new. And it sure as hell shouldn't be considered something that's only done by revolutionary companies!

    One of our slides talks about those that don't know history are destined to think everything they do is new and social media should be right at the top of that list! Yes, there's cool stuff being done with technology out there and lots of it is fun. I told the National Association of Newspaper audience that every paper is the US should have Twitter set up for their readers. I believe in the power of connecting to your audience through these new tools to help create more authentic, compelling and relevant brand experiences. Look at how Adrenalina is using the Flowrider to create a cool surfing community right in the store. And I helped start a Lab here in Soho because I like cool new toys more then just anyone I know. I can't wait to see to start playing with things like augmented reality to see how we can create damn cool brand experiences with them.

    But the discussion by most in the ad industry about social media is just the latest tactic du jour. We had branded content, Second Life, viral, WOM, and on and on. Read the trades and look at how many times over the past couple of years, a slew of companies were built around chasing the tactic du jour. How many social media companies have been started in the past 6 months? But we do this instead of helping clients understand the true value of connecting with their audience by any means possible and appropriate. For many agencies and clients, they're just tactics that we jump on and jump off like they were a trampoline.

    And this is why I believe that, as a whole, the advertising industry will completely screw up the entire social media thing until it becomes just as useless as what we now call traditional advertising is today. Because too many of them think that listening to clients counts as doing something revolutionary.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/23998/27188642

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Advertising Will Destroy Social Media:

    Comments

    The other part of the equation is that, as I've been going on about for the past year "Your Brand Is Not My Friend™"

    That means that unless you're one of the few Prom King Brands, I'm not going to want to interact with you in a social media space. I'm there to be social. Not to hear from brands I don't have much interest in.

    That means you need to find something useful to give me, something that *I* want to do/hear/play with (vs. something you want to tell me). Do that, and I may actually listen to you.

    The advertisers that disrupt the social experience will be viewed as a nuisance at best. As advertisers continue to encroach on this environment, as they continue to pollute and dilute the value of the interactions, users will begin to disrespect and even openly "bash" the encroaching advertisers.

    And everyone else will learn.

    Just look at Edelman and Wallmart. When was the last time YOU read a splog?

    Today marketing is about accountability, measurement, and that begins with relevance and dialog. This information is more used to all marketers.

    Shhh. Don't tell them it's not cool. Let them all start listening to customers again. Then, when they see the ROI of doing a better job communicating, listening, taking customer opinions seriously, and start dedicating people and resources to it...maybe they won't be able to stop?

    The revolutionary is hype speak. Drop the "r" and you get evolutionary. True, many brands stopped listening, but simply listening isn't enough.

    That's why I shake my head (like you have here) when I read overblown proclamations on the to do the new right way.

    Post a comment

    May 2008

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31